Screener
IYZ vs GXPC
iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF vs Global X Purecap MSCI Communication Services ETF
Key differences
- GXPC costs 0.23% less per year.
- IYZ is significantly larger than GXPC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IYZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IYZ | GXPC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $966M | $77M |
| Since | 2000 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.59% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +63.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +30.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.43 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.46% | — |
| Max drawdown | -39.74% | -16.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IYZ and GXPC
Explore further