Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

JCHI vs GSJY

JPMorgan Active China ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF

JCHI

JPMorgan Active China ETF

Annual cost

0.65%

Fund size

$15M

GSJY

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF

Annual cost

0.25%

Fund size

$84M

Key differences

Both JCHI and GSJY are equity ETFs. JCHI charges 0.65% a year and GSJY 0.25%. The main difference: JCHI follows a active selection strategy; GSJY uses index tracking.

  • JCHI follows a active selection strategy; GSJY uses index tracking.
  • JCHI covers emerging markets; GSJY covers the Asia-Pacific region.
  • GSJY costs 0.40% less per year.
  • GSJY is much larger than JCHI. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, GSJY has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • GSJY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

JCHIGSJY
Annual cost (TER)0.65%0.25%
Fund size (AUM)$15M$84M
Since20232016
Dividend yield1.80%1.75%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsasia pacific
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+12.5%+25.9%
CAGR 3Y+9.2%+18.4%
CAGR 5YN/A+8.4%
Sharpe 3Y0.330.80
Volatility 1Y17.85%19.75%
Max drawdown-29.57%-32.53%

Similar to JCHI and GSJY