Screener
JDVL vs JHSC
John Hancock Disciplined Value Select ETF vs John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF
Key differences
- JDVL follows a active selection strategy; JHSC uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| JDVL | JHSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.42% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $669M |
| Since | — | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.02% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +25.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +15.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.66 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.33% |
| Max drawdown | -9.17% | -42.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to JDVL and JHSC
Explore further