Screener
JGRW vs FQAL
Jensen Quality Growth ETF vs Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
Key differences
- FQAL costs 0.42% less per year.
- FQAL is significantly larger than JGRW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- JGRW follows a active selection strategy; FQAL uses index tracking.
- FQAL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| JGRW | FQAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.57% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $100M | $1.4B |
| Since | 2024 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.46% | 1.16% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.1% | +22.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.78% | 11.34% |
| Max drawdown | -14.63% | -33.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to JGRW and FQAL
Explore further