Screener
JGRW vs JQUA
Jensen Quality Growth ETF vs JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
Key differences
- JQUA costs 0.45% less per year.
- JQUA is significantly larger than JGRW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- JGRW follows a active selection strategy; JQUA uses index tracking.
- JQUA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| JGRW | JQUA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.57% | 0.12% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $100M | $7.5B |
| Since | 2024 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.46% | 1.16% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.1% | +20.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.78% | 11.26% |
| Max drawdown | -14.63% | -32.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to JGRW and JQUA
Explore further