Screener
JHEM vs EMES
John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF vs Harbor Emerging Markets Select ETF
Key differences
- JHEM costs 0.16% less per year.
- JHEM is significantly larger than EMES — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- JHEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| JHEM | EMES | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $945M | $11M |
| Since | 2018 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.11% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +47.7% | +43.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.06 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.64% | 20.75% |
| Max drawdown | -34.99% | -12.98% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to JHEM and EMES
Explore further