Screener
JHML vs ROSC
John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF vs Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF
Key differences
- JHML costs 0.05% less per year.
- JHML is significantly larger than ROSC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- JHML follows a index enhanced strategy; ROSC uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, JHML has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| JHML | ROSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.1B | $55M |
| Since | 2015 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.99% | 1.87% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.2% | +33.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.7% | +17.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.9% | +8.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.15 | 0.77 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.62% | 15.75% |
| Max drawdown | -36.13% | -43.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to JHML and ROSC
Explore further