Screener
JHSC vs JDVL
John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF vs John Hancock Disciplined Value Select ETF
Key differences
- JHSC follows a index tracking strategy; JDVL uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| JHSC | JDVL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.42% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $669M | — |
| Since | 2017 | — |
| Dividend yield | 1.02% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.66 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.33% | — |
| Max drawdown | -42.66% | -9.17% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to JHSC and JDVL
Explore further