Skip to content
Screener

JLQD vs GHYB

Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF vs Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF

JLQD

Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF

Annual cost

0.20%

Fund size

$14M

GHYB

Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$130M

Key differences

Both JLQD and GHYB are fixed income ETFs. JLQD charges 0.20% a year and GHYB 0.15%. The main difference: JLQD follows a active selection strategy; GHYB uses index tracking.

  • JLQD follows a active selection strategy; GHYB uses index tracking.
  • GHYB costs 0.05% less per year.
  • GHYB is much larger than JLQD. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, GHYB has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

JLQDGHYB
Annual cost (TER)0.20%0.15%
Fund size (AUM)$14M$130M
Since20212017
Dividend yield5.86%6.84%
Asset classfixed incomefixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+5.7%+7.0%
CAGR 3Y+5.9%+8.9%
CAGR 5YN/A+4.1%
Sharpe 3Y0.410.95
Volatility 1Y3.82%3.54%
Max drawdown-21.17%-21.48%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to JLQD and GHYB