Screener
JPAN vs SCJ
Matthews Japan Active ETF vs iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
Both JPAN and SCJ are equity ETFs. JPAN charges 0.79% a year and SCJ 0.50%. The main difference: JPAN follows a active selection strategy; SCJ uses index tracking.
- JPAN follows a active selection strategy; SCJ uses index tracking.
- SCJ costs 0.29% less per year.
- SCJ is much larger than JPAN. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| JPAN | SCJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $245M |
| Since | 2023 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 4.34% | 2.70% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.2% | +27.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.92% | 16.22% |
| Max drawdown | -15.25% | -37.28% |
Similar to JPAN and SCJ
Explore further