Screener
JPAN vs GSJY
Matthews Japan Active ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF
Key differences
Both JPAN and GSJY are equity ETFs. JPAN charges 0.79% a year and GSJY 0.25%. The main difference: JPAN follows a active selection strategy; GSJY uses index tracking.
- JPAN follows a active selection strategy; GSJY uses index tracking.
- GSJY costs 0.54% less per year.
- GSJY is much larger than JPAN. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- GSJY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| JPAN | GSJY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $84M |
| Since | 2023 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 4.34% | 1.75% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.2% | +25.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.92% | 19.75% |
| Max drawdown | -15.25% | -32.53% |
Similar to JPAN and GSJY
Explore further