Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

JQUA vs JGRW

JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF vs Jensen Quality Growth ETF

JQUA

JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF

JPMorgan

Annual cost

0.12%

Fund size

$7.5B

JGRW

Jensen Quality Growth ETF

Jensen

Annual cost

0.57%

Fund size

$100M

Key differences

  • JQUA costs 0.45% less per year.
  • JQUA is significantly larger than JGRW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • JQUA follows a index tracking strategy; JGRW uses active selection.
  • JQUA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

JQUAJGRW
Annual cost (TER)0.12%0.57%
Fund size (AUM)$7.5B$100M
Since20172024
Dividend yield1.16%0.46%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingactive selection
CAGR 1Y+22.5%+5.2%
CAGR 3Y+20.2%N/A
CAGR 5Y+14.0%N/A
Sharpe 3Y1.16N/A
Volatility 1Y11.31%11.76%
Max drawdown-32.92%-14.63%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to JQUA and JGRW