Screener
KAT vs CEFS
Scharf ETF vs Saba Closed-End Funds ETF
Key differences
- KAT costs 1.86% less per year.
- KAT is classified as equity, while CEFS is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- KAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KAT | CEFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 2.61% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $688M | $402M |
| Since | 2011 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.39% | 6.24% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +24.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.39 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 9.92% |
| Max drawdown | -9.25% | -38.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KAT and CEFS
Explore further