Screener
KAT vs CGGE
Scharf ETF vs Capital Group Global Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGGE costs 0.28% less per year.
- CGGE is significantly larger than KAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KAT follows a active selection strategy; CGGE uses index tracking.
- KAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KAT | CGGE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $688M | $2.5B |
| Since | 2011 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.39% | 0.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +23.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.84% |
| Max drawdown | -9.25% | -14.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KAT and CGGE
Explore further