Screener
KAT vs CGGO
Scharf ETF vs Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGGO costs 0.28% less per year.
- CGGO is significantly larger than KAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KAT | CGGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $688M | $10.1B |
| Since | 2011 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.39% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +32.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.99 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.59% |
| Max drawdown | -9.25% | -24.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KAT and CGGO
Explore further