Screener
KAT vs CPLS
Scharf ETF vs AB Core Plus Bond ETF
Key differences
- CPLS costs 0.45% less per year.
- KAT is significantly larger than CPLS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KAT is classified as equity, while CPLS is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- KAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KAT | CPLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $688M | $216M |
| Since | 2011 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.39% | 4.65% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +5.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 3.91% |
| Max drawdown | -9.25% | -4.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KAT and CPLS
Explore further