Screener
KAT vs GSEU
Scharf ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF
Key differences
- GSEU costs 0.50% less per year.
- KAT is significantly larger than GSEU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KAT follows a active selection strategy; GSEU uses index tracking.
- KAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KAT | GSEU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $688M | $114M |
| Since | 2011 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.39% | 2.61% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +19.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.17% |
| Max drawdown | -9.25% | -35.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KAT and GSEU
Explore further