Screener
KAT vs MEMA
Scharf ETF vs Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF
Key differences
- KAT costs 0.10% less per year.
- KAT is significantly larger than MEMA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KAT is classified as equity, while MEMA is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- KAT follows a active selection strategy; MEMA uses long short.
- KAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KAT | MEMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $688M | $12M |
| Since | 2011 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.39% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -9.25% | -13.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KAT and MEMA
Explore further