Screener
KAUG vs FNDA
Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - August vs Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF
Key differences
- FNDA costs 0.54% less per year.
- FNDA is significantly larger than KAUG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KAUG is classified as alternative, while FNDA is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- KAUG follows a structured outcome strategy; FNDA uses index tracking.
- FNDA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KAUG | FNDA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $80M | $10.2B |
| Since | 2024 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.10% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.6% | +32.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.09% | 17.24% |
| Max drawdown | -15.66% | -44.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KAUG and FNDA
Explore further