Screener
KAUG vs GTO
Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - August vs Invesco Total Return Bond ETF
Key differences
KAUG is an alternative ETF, while GTO is a fixed income ETF. KAUG charges 0.79% a year and GTO 0.35%.
- KAUG is an alternative fund, while GTO is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- KAUG follows a structured outcome strategy; GTO uses active selection.
- GTO costs 0.44% less per year.
- GTO is much larger than KAUG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- GTO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KAUG | GTO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $75M | $2.3B |
| Since | 2024 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 4.75% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.5% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.03% | 3.43% |
| Max drawdown | -15.66% | -20.75% |
Similar to KAUG and GTO
Explore further