Screener
KDRN vs ICSH
Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF vs iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF
Key differences
- ICSH costs 0.54% less per year.
- ICSH is significantly larger than KDRN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KDRN follows a index tracking strategy; ICSH uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, ICSH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ICSH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KDRN | ICSH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.62% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1M | $7.3B |
| Since | 2021 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 3.12% | 4.41% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.2% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.7% | +5.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.04 | 3.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.64% | 0.41% |
| Max drawdown | -15.29% | -3.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KDRN and ICSH
Explore further