Screener
KDRN vs SHV
Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF vs iShares 0–1 Year Treasury Bond ETF
Key differences
- SHV costs 0.47% less per year.
- SHV is significantly larger than KDRN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SHV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SHV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KDRN | SHV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.62% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1M | $20.6B |
| Since | 2021 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 3.12% | 3.92% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.2% | +4.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.7% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.04 | 4.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.64% | 0.21% |
| Max drawdown | -15.29% | -0.45% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KDRN and SHV
Explore further