Screener
KEAT vs BAMA
Keating Active ETF vs Brookstone Active ETF
Key differences
KEAT is an equity ETF, while BAMA is a mixed asset ETF. KEAT charges 0.85% a year and BAMA 0.99%.
- KEAT is an equity fund, while BAMA is a mixed asset fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- KEAT costs 0.14% less per year.
Side-by-side comparison
| KEAT | BAMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.99% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $123M | $53M |
| Since | 2024 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 2.24% | 1.31% |
| Asset class | equity | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.4% | +17.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.47% | 9.51% |
| Max drawdown | -7.45% | -12.27% |
Similar to KEAT and BAMA
Explore further