Screener
KEAT vs MAVF
Keating Active ETF vs Matrix Advisors Value ETF
Key differences
- MAVF costs 0.10% less per year.
- MAVF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KEAT | MAVF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $120M | $91M |
| Since | 2024 | 1996 |
| Dividend yield | 2.20% | 0.23% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.9% | +36.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.23% | 14.06% |
| Max drawdown | -7.45% | -14.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KEAT and MAVF
Explore further