Screener
KEAT vs WZRD
Keating Active ETF vs Opportunistic Trader ETF
Key differences
- KEAT costs 0.15% less per year.
- KEAT is significantly larger than WZRD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KEAT is classified as equity, while WZRD is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- KEAT follows a active selection strategy; WZRD uses structured outcome.
Side-by-side comparison
| KEAT | WZRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 1.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $120M | $4M |
| Since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.20% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.23% | — |
| Max drawdown | -7.45% | -71.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KEAT and WZRD
Explore further