Screener
KGRN vs AQWA
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology ETF vs Global X Clean Water ETF
Key differences
- AQWA costs 0.29% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, AQWA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| KGRN | AQWA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $62M | $26M |
| Since | 2017 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.82% | 1.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -0.5% | +3.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +1.3% | +9.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | -6.0% | +5.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.09 | 0.45 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.19% | 14.38% |
| Max drawdown | -66.37% | -29.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KGRN and AQWA
Explore further