Screener
KGRN vs PBD
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology ETF vs Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- PBD is significantly larger than KGRN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KGRN covers emerging markets markets; PBD covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, PBD has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PBD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KGRN | PBD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $62M | $208M |
| Since | 2017 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.82% | 1.74% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -0.5% | +88.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +1.3% | +8.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -6.0% | -2.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.09 | 0.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.19% | 23.23% |
| Max drawdown | -66.37% | -75.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KGRN and PBD
Explore further