Screener
KGRN vs CTEX
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology ETF vs ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF
Key differences
- CTEX costs 0.21% less per year.
- KGRN is significantly larger than CTEX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KGRN covers emerging markets markets; CTEX covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, CTEX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| KGRN | CTEX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.58% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $62M | $6M |
| Since | 2017 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.82% | 1.85% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +2.9% | +156.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.3% | +18.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | -6.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.12 | 0.53 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.17% | 41.38% |
| Max drawdown | -66.37% | -70.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KGRN and CTEX
Explore further