Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

KGRN vs CNRG

KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF

KGRN

KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology ETF

KraneShares

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$62M

CNRG

State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF

State Street Investment Management

Annual cost

0.45%

Fund size

$222M

Key differences

  • CNRG costs 0.34% less per year.
  • CNRG is significantly larger than KGRN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • KGRN is classified as equity, while CNRG is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
  • KGRN covers emerging markets markets; CNRG covers north america.
  • Over the last 3 years, CNRG has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

KGRNCNRG
Annual cost (TER)0.79%0.45%
Fund size (AUM)$62M$222M
Since20172018
Dividend yield0.82%1.20%
Asset classequityalternative
Regionemerging marketsnorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y-0.5%+105.0%
CAGR 3Y+1.3%+14.1%
CAGR 5Y-6.0%+5.5%
Sharpe 3Y0.090.45
Volatility 1Y23.19%36.25%
Max drawdown-66.37%-68.49%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to KGRN and CNRG