Screener
KGRN vs KEMX
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology ETF vs KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
Key differences
- KEMX costs 0.55% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, KEMX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| KGRN | KEMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $62M | $118M |
| Since | 2017 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.82% | 2.67% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -0.5% | +66.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +1.3% | +27.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | -6.0% | +13.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.09 | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.19% | 21.87% |
| Max drawdown | -66.37% | -38.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KGRN and KEMX
Explore further