Screener
KGRN vs KURE
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology ETF vs KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF
Key differences
- KURE costs 0.14% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, KGRN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| KGRN | KURE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $62M | $82M |
| Since | 2017 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.82% | 4.14% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -0.5% | +4.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +1.3% | -5.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | -6.0% | -14.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.09 | -0.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.19% | 26.26% |
| Max drawdown | -66.37% | -68.53% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KGRN and KURE
Explore further