Screener
KJUN vs IJS
Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - June vs iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
Key differences
- IJS costs 0.61% less per year.
- IJS is significantly larger than KJUN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KJUN is classified as alternative, while IJS is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- KJUN follows a structured outcome strategy; IJS uses index tracking.
- IJS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KJUN | IJS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $17M | $7.9B |
| Since | 2024 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.31% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.1% | +38.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +14.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.59 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.65% | 18.46% |
| Max drawdown | -14.44% | -47.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KJUN and IJS
Explore further