Screener
KJUN vs VIOV
Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - June vs Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value Index Fund ETF Shares
Key differences
- VIOV costs 0.69% less per year.
- VIOV is significantly larger than KJUN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KJUN is classified as alternative, while VIOV is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- KJUN follows a structured outcome strategy; VIOV uses index tracking.
- VIOV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KJUN | VIOV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.10% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $17M | $1.8B |
| Since | 2024 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.61% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.1% | +38.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +15.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.60 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.65% | 18.61% |
| Max drawdown | -14.44% | -47.36% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KJUN and VIOV
Explore further