Screener
KLMN vs EMCR
Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF vs Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF
Key differences
- KLMN costs 0.06% less per year.
- KLMN is significantly larger than EMCR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KLMN covers north america markets; EMCR covers emerging markets.
- EMCR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KLMN | EMCR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.2B | $54M |
| Since | 2024 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 1.34% | 2.18% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.0% | +41.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.32% | 19.22% |
| Max drawdown | -18.54% | -34.28% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KLMN and EMCR
Explore further