Screener
KLMT vs SMOG
Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF vs VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
Key differences
- KLMT costs 0.54% less per year.
- KLMT is significantly larger than SMOG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SMOG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KLMT | SMOG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.10% | 0.64% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $152M |
| Since | 2024 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.84% | 1.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.7% | +43.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +11.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.45 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.65% | 20.30% |
| Max drawdown | -16.88% | -51.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KLMT and SMOG
Explore further