Screener
KMAR vs FLCB
Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March vs Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF
Key differences
- FLCB costs 0.64% less per year.
- FLCB is significantly larger than KMAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KMAR is classified as alternative, while FLCB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- KMAR follows a structured outcome strategy; FLCB uses index tracking.
- FLCB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KMAR | FLCB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $35M | $2.9B |
| Since | 2025 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 4.23% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.0% | +5.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.38% | 3.89% |
| Max drawdown | -10.06% | -18.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KMAR and FLCB
Explore further