Screener
KMAR vs PICB
Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March vs Invesco International Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- PICB costs 0.29% less per year.
- PICB is significantly larger than KMAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KMAR is classified as alternative, while PICB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- KMAR follows a structured outcome strategy; PICB uses index tracking.
- PICB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KMAR | PICB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $35M | $360M |
| Since | 2025 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 3.29% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.0% | +4.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +6.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.34 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.38% | 7.82% |
| Max drawdown | -10.06% | -37.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KMAR and PICB
Explore further