Screener
KONG vs ADIV
Formidable Fortress ETF vs Guinness Atkinson Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF
Key differences
KONG is an alternative ETF, while ADIV is an equity ETF. KONG charges 0.89% a year and ADIV 0.78%.
- KONG is an alternative fund, while ADIV is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- KONG follows a option income strategy; ADIV uses active selection.
- ADIV costs 0.11% less per year.
- Over the last three years, ADIV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ADIV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KONG | ADIV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.89% | 0.78% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22M | $56M |
| Since | 2021 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | 2.69% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.3% | +14.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.8% | +17.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.53 | 0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.91% | 13.84% |
| Max drawdown | -19.98% | -31.55% |
Similar to KONG and ADIV
Explore further