Screener
KONG vs AQLT
Formidable Fortress ETF vs iShares MSCI Global Quality Factor ETF
Key differences
- AQLT costs 0.69% less per year.
- AQLT is significantly larger than KONG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KONG is classified as alternative, while AQLT is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- KONG follows a option income strategy; AQLT uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| KONG | AQLT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.89% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22M | $246M |
| Since | 2021 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | 0.97% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.2% | +29.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.49 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.91% | 13.50% |
| Max drawdown | -19.98% | -16.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KONG and AQLT
Explore further