Screener
KONG vs BINC
Formidable Fortress ETF vs iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
Key differences
KONG is an alternative ETF, while BINC is a fixed income ETF. KONG charges 0.89% a year and BINC 0.40%.
- KONG is an alternative fund, while BINC is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- KONG follows a option income strategy; BINC uses active selection.
- BINC costs 0.49% less per year.
- BINC is much larger than KONG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, KONG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| KONG | BINC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.89% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22M | $16.8B |
| Since | 2021 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | 5.54% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.9% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.9% | +6.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.46 | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.88% | 2.28% |
| Max drawdown | -19.98% | -2.69% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.