Screener
KONG vs CAML
Formidable Fortress ETF vs Congress Large Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- CAML costs 0.24% less per year.
- CAML is significantly larger than KONG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KONG is classified as alternative, while CAML is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- KONG follows a option income strategy; CAML uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| KONG | CAML | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.89% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22M | $376M |
| Since | 2021 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.1% | +15.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.48 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.90% | 14.66% |
| Max drawdown | -19.98% | -21.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KONG and CAML
Explore further