Screener
KONG vs FBCV
Formidable Fortress ETF vs Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF
Key differences
- FBCV costs 0.32% less per year.
- FBCV is significantly larger than KONG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KONG is classified as alternative, while FBCV is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- KONG follows a option income strategy; FBCV uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, FBCV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| KONG | FBCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.89% | 0.57% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22M | $160M |
| Since | 2021 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | 1.44% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.1% | +27.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.1% | +15.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.48 | 0.93 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.90% | 10.58% |
| Max drawdown | -19.98% | -15.55% |
Similar to KONG and FBCV
Explore further