Screener
KONG vs GSIE
Formidable Fortress ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF
Key differences
- GSIE costs 0.64% less per year.
- GSIE is significantly larger than KONG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KONG is classified as alternative, while GSIE is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- KONG follows a option income strategy; GSIE uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, GSIE has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GSIE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KONG | GSIE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.89% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22M | $5.6B |
| Since | 2021 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | 2.55% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | option income | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.1% | +21.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.1% | +16.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.48 | 0.87 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.90% | 14.23% |
| Max drawdown | -19.98% | -34.63% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KONG and GSIE
Explore further