Screener
KONG vs GSLC
Formidable Fortress ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
Key differences
- GSLC costs 0.80% less per year.
- GSLC is significantly larger than KONG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KONG is classified as alternative, while GSLC is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- KONG follows a option income strategy; GSLC uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, GSLC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GSLC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KONG | GSLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.89% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22M | $15.0B |
| Since | 2021 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | 0.97% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.1% | +26.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.1% | +21.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.48 | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.90% | 11.85% |
| Max drawdown | -19.98% | -33.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KONG and GSLC
Explore further