Screener
KONG vs LCR
Formidable Fortress ETF vs Leuthold Core ETF
Key differences
- LCR costs 0.05% less per year.
- LCR is significantly larger than KONG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KONG is classified as alternative, while LCR is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- KONG follows a option income strategy; LCR uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, LCR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| KONG | LCR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.89% | 0.84% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22M | $70M |
| Since | 2021 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | 1.35% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.2% | +14.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.3% | +11.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.49 | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.91% | 7.52% |
| Max drawdown | -19.98% | -17.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KONG and LCR
Explore further