Screener
KONG vs LRGF
Formidable Fortress ETF vs iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF
Key differences
- LRGF costs 0.81% less per year.
- LRGF is significantly larger than KONG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KONG is classified as alternative, while LRGF is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- KONG follows a option income strategy; LRGF uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, LRGF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- LRGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KONG | LRGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.89% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22M | $3.3B |
| Since | 2021 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | 1.13% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.2% | +25.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.3% | +23.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.49 | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.91% | 12.16% |
| Max drawdown | -19.98% | -36.03% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KONG and LRGF
Explore further