Screener
KONG vs TMFE
Formidable Fortress ETF vs Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index ETF
Key differences
- TMFE costs 0.39% less per year.
- TMFE is significantly larger than KONG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KONG is classified as alternative, while TMFE is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- KONG follows a option income strategy; TMFE uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, TMFE has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| KONG | TMFE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.89% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22M | $84M |
| Since | 2021 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | 0.32% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.2% | +10.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.3% | +21.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.49 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.91% | 12.24% |
| Max drawdown | -19.98% | -31.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KONG and TMFE
Explore further