Screener
KONG vs TMFC
Formidable Fortress ETF vs Motley Fool 100 Index ETF
Key differences
- TMFC costs 0.39% less per year.
- TMFC is significantly larger than KONG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KONG is classified as alternative, while TMFC is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- KONG follows a option income strategy; TMFC uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, TMFC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| KONG | TMFC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.89% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22M | $2.0B |
| Since | 2021 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | 0.14% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.2% | +28.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.3% | +28.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +16.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.49 | 1.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.91% | 13.72% |
| Max drawdown | -19.98% | -33.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KONG and TMFC
Explore further