Screener
KPHO vs AFK
KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF vs VanEck Africa Index ETF
Key differences
Both KPHO and AFK are equity ETFs. KPHO charges 1.03% a year and AFK 0.76%. The main difference: AFK costs 0.27% less per year.
- AFK costs 0.27% less per year.
- AFK is much larger than KPHO. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- AFK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KPHO | AFK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.03% | 0.76% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $117M |
| Since | 2025 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.98% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +35.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 26.09% |
| Max drawdown | -14.34% | -53.33% |
Similar to KPHO and AFK
Explore further