Screener
KPHO vs VNM
KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF vs VanEck Vietnam ETF
Key differences
Both KPHO and VNM are equity ETFs. KPHO charges 1.03% a year and VNM 0.66%. The main difference: KPHO covers emerging markets; VNM covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- KPHO covers emerging markets; VNM covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- VNM costs 0.37% less per year.
- VNM is much larger than KPHO. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- VNM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KPHO | VNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.03% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $570M |
| Since | 2025 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.20% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +30.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +15.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -0.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.54 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 26.82% |
| Max drawdown | -14.34% | -51.67% |
Similar to KPHO and VNM
Explore further